Презентация на тему "Emotions in group"

Содержание

• 
  Слайд 1

  Emotions in group

  Maria Bultseva Anastasia Konik Germogen Rodionov Marina Vylegzhanina

• 
  Слайд 2

  TEAM MOOD

   “bottom-up” definition contagious positive emotions can lead to increased cooperation, less conflict and better perceived performance in groups, while contagious unpleasant emotions can lead to the reverse (Gibson, 2003); the CEO and his management team share the same affective personality they are more satisfied, have greater shared decision-making, less group conflict and are more productive as a team (Barsade, Ward, Turner, Sonnenfeld , 2000).

• 
  Слайд 3
  

   “top-down” definition in a health care setting found that an emotional culture of companionate love led not only to better outcomes for employees, but to the patients they cared for, as well as the families of those patients (Mclean & Elkind, 2003); leader sets emotional culture, but should consider both processes.

• 
  Слайд 4

  Emotion regulation and leadership

  ER refers to strategies used to control or manage the experience of emotions, while focusing on their temporal nature in the process of regulating one’s emotions (Gross & Thompson, 2006). The leaders’ ability to manage their own and their followers’ emotions effectively can contribute to increased leader effectiveness, a healthier organizational climate, and positive organizational job outcomes(Haver, Akerjordet, 2013). BUT ER competencies differ across cultures and organizational contexts (Kafetsios, 2012; Liu, 2010).

• 
  Слайд 5

  EMOTION REGULATION: Strategies

  Suppression: suppressors focus more on changing emotional displays rather than changing true feelings (Grandey, Foo, Groth, & Goodwin, 2012). Reappraisal: it is more difficult to execute, because it requires a high degree of consciousness and personal effort to change emotionally charged situations (Grandey, 2000).

• 
  Слайд 6

  Excessive anger

  https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=DEgIH8RL3wgv The Dual Threshold Model (Geddes & Callister, 2007) provides a framework for understanding the phenomenon of workers whose anger intensity is more severe. The “Expression Threshold” refers to a minimal level of emotional expression required for the worker’s anger to be recognized by others in the workplace. The “Impropriety Threshold” occurs when workers go beyond the acceptable norm for anger expression in a specific workplace.

• 
  Слайд 7
  

  Men’s, compared to women’s, anger expressions are typically more accepted as societal and corporate norms reinforce direct anger expressions (and consequences) more readily for men than women (Fitness, 2000).

• 
  Слайд 8

  Triggers for anger (MOURA, 2013)

  Unfair treatment. Perceived workplace incompetence. Disregard by others. Concern for the bottom line.

• 
  Слайд 9

  Expressions of anger (MOURA, 2013)

  Verbal attack. Physical attack. Anger-in.

• 
  Слайд 10

  Bad advice

  Forget your emotional intelligence and let your amygdala do the talking. Stick to your guns See the glass half-empty. Truly don’t care about people. Don’t think too much—especially about your motives and feelings.

• 
  Слайд 11

  Good advice

  Managerial activities: Leader’s control of emotional display  Emotional intelligence  Feedbacks and celebrations Monitoring and improving team climate Humor Environment: Lighting and colours Air quality and odors Temperature and humidity Ergonomics

• 
  Слайд 12

  Any questions?

• 
  Слайд 13
  

  Thank you for attention!

• 
  Слайд 14

  Sources

  http://www.europeanbusinessreview.com/?p=576 https://hbr.org/2015/07/the-emotional-impulses-that-poison-healthy-teams http://www.slideshare.net/marcosampietro/mood-and-emotions-impact-on-team-performance http://jlo.sagepub.com/content/early/2013/04/04/1548051813485438